BUS FPX 3050 Assessment 1 Communication, Ethics, and a Command Decision
Phillip March 1, 2024 No Comments

BUS FPX 3050 Assessment 1 Communication, Ethics, and a Command Decision

BUS FPX 3050 Assessment 1 Communication, Ethics, and a Command Decision


Capella university

BUS-FPX3050 Fundamentals of Organizational Communication

Prof. Name


Communication, Ethics, and a Command Decision

Part 1: Analysis of the Scenario

The outbreak of COVID-19 on the U.S.S. Theodore Roosevelt in April 2020 offers a significant opportunity to explore ethical communication issues. However, the unique context within the United States Navy introduces complexities that may limit the generalizability of lessons learned. The hierarchical structure of the military’s chain of command, while traditional, can be obscure to the public, yet it forms the crux of this case. Thus, a thorough examination of the facts is essential to fully assess the ethics involved.

It is now evident that Captain Crozier directed his communication exclusively to Navy officers, including those higher in rank than his immediate superior, contrary to Acting Navy Secretary Modly’s assertions. Modly’s misrepresentation of the letter’s distribution and its contents, particularly regarding Crozier’s concerns and Rear Adm. Baker’s dismissal of them, underscores the ethical nuances at play (Kheel, 2020).

In circumventing Baker, Crozier’s actions do not appear unethical. The chain of command serves organizational efficiency but should not supersede ethical considerations, as noted by the Army War College (Piellusch, 2018). By neglecting Crozier’s concerns, Baker effectively forced the issue into the public domain. Consequently, Crozier’s decision to bypass Baker seems justified, especially given the urgent health crisis aboard the ship.

BUS FPX 3050 Assessment 1 Communication, Ethics, and a Command Decision

Crozier’s letter itself demonstrates clear, solution-oriented communication, devoid of personal agendas or sensitive information. The absence of ethical concerns within the letter’s contents supports the notion that Crozier acted with integrity.

Regarding potential leaks to the press, no evidence suggests Crozier engaged in such actions. Even if he had, absent indications of ulterior motives, concerns about the ethics of public dissemination appear unfounded.

In comparing military and private sector standards, the higher ethical expectations in the military suggest even fewer concerns in civilian contexts. Thus, the focus shifts to the disproportionate consequences faced by Crozier, driven by political motives, which stand as a more egregious ethical breach than any action by Crozier himself (Ignatius, 2020).

Part 2: Public Communication

In light of the unjust consequences faced by Captain Crozier, it is imperative to address the systemic issues hindering effective communication within the U.S. military. Recent events surrounding the U.S.S. Theodore Roosevelt reveal a concerning trend of punitive measures against those seeking to safeguard the health and safety of service members.

As a Navy captain deeply troubled by these developments, I urge national attention to the erosion of integrity within our institutions. The ordeal faced by Captain Crozier underscores the urgent need to shield our armed forces from political interference and uphold the principles of meritocracy and ethical conduct.

It is time to restore confidence in our institutions, ensuring that dedicated individuals like Captain Crozier can serve without fear of reprisal. The integrity of our military and the safety of our personnel depend on it.


Ignatius, D. (2020, April 6). Acting Navy chief fired Crozier for ‘panicking’ – and before Trump could intervene. The Washington Posthttps://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2020/04/05/acting-navy-chief-fired-crozier-panicking-before-trump-might-intervene/.

Kheel, R. (2020, April 16). Fired captain sent memo to fewer people than former Navy head alleged: report. The Hillhttps://thehill.com/policy/defense/493192-fired-captain-sent-memo-to-fewer-people-than-former-navy-head-alleged-report.

Piellusch, M. (2018, September 6). IS THE ‘CHAIN OF COMMAND’ STILL MEANINGFUL? War Room – U.S. Army War Collegehttps://warroom.armywarcollege.edu/articles/chain-of-command/.

BUS FPX 3050 Assessment 1 Communication, Ethics, and a Command Decision

error: Content is protected, Contact team if you want Free paper for your class!!