NURS FPX 4060 Assessment 3 Disaster Recovery Plan
Phillip April 19, 2024 No Comments

Disaster Recovery Plan

NURS FPX 4060 Assessment 3 Disaster Recovery Plan

Name

Capella university

NURS-FPX 4060 Practicing in the Community to Improve Population Health

Prof. Name

Date

Disaster Recovery Plan

Today, we will delve into a crisis response strategy tailored for the Vila Health community, focusing on mitigating the consequences of a train derailment incident. This unfortunate occurrence led to the loss of lives, medical admissions, displacement, and tainted water sources. Our approach intends to reduce health inequalities and enhance service accessibility, taking into account the distinct requirements and assets of the community. The plan is based on Healthy People 2020 and 2030 objectives, using the MAP-IT framework to guide its development. The framework ensures a systematic approach for identifying stakeholders, assessing needs, developing a targeted plan, implementing it, and tracking progress to ensure success.

Introduction

In this presentation, we will delve deeper into the determinants of health and barriers impacting safety, health, and disaster recovery efforts. We will also outline strategies for overcoming communication barriers, enhancing collaboration, and leveraging health and governmental policies to improve disaster recovery outcomes. Our goal is to ensure the resilience and well-being of the Vila Health community.

Determinants of Health and Barriers Impacting Safety, Health, and Disaster Recovery Efforts

In the context of a train derailment, various social, cultural, and economic factors influence health and act as barriers that hinder safety, well-being, and disaster recovery initiatives within the community. Each factor will be discussed separately, emphasizing their interrelationships and the cascading effects they have on one another.

Cultural Factors

Cultural factors play a significant role in disaster recovery efforts as they can impact communication, trust, and decision-making. Language barriers and cultural norms may affect the ability of some community members to access information, resources, and support during a disaster. Recognizing and addressing cultural factors can help in tailoring recovery efforts to the specific needs of diverse populations, ensuring inclusivity and promoting overall community resilience.

Social Factors and Social Support Networks

Strong social support networks are crucial in disaster recovery efforts. However, social barriers such as isolation of vulnerable populations, including the elderly, disabled, and non-English speakers, can hinder access to healthcare and support systems. Strengthening social support networks through targeted outreach and community engagement can help individuals cope with the emotional and psychological impacts of the disaster and facilitate recovery. Addressing social barriers and their impact on recovery efforts is essential for a comprehensive disaster recovery plan.

Economic Factors

Socioeconomic status can impact an individual’s ability to cope with and recover from a disaster. Low-income families may have limited resources to evacuate, rebuild their homes, or access essential services. Addressing socioeconomic disparities requires targeted assistance programs and equitable distribution of resources to ensure that all community members can recover from the disaster, regardless of their income level.

Environmental Conditions

The train derailment scenario led to water supply contamination, posing a significant environmental barrier to health and safety. Restoring the community’s water supply and addressing other environmental hazards requires a collaborative effort among public health officials, environmental agencies, and the community. Addressing environmental conditions is crucial for ensuring the overall well-being of the community and preventing long-term health consequences.

Determinants of Health (Healthy People 2030)

The determinants of health, as identified by Healthy People 2030, include biological, behavioral, social, and environmental factors that can impact the health and well-being of individuals and communities. In the context of disaster recovery, understanding and addressing these determinants of health can help create a more comprehensive and effective recovery plan that considers the unique needs of the affected population.

The MAP-IT Framework in Disaster Recovery

The disaster recovery strategy for the Vila Health community, addressing the train derailment situation, has been developed using the Mobilize, Assess, Plan, Implement, and Track (MAP-IT) framework. The goal of this strategy is to reduce health inequalities and enhance access to community resources by integrating social justice principles and cultural awareness. The MAP-IT framework was used to guide the development of the disaster recovery strategy, and the plan includes the following evidence-based key components:

Conclusion

In conclusion, our comprehensive disaster recovery plan addresses the aftermath of the train derailment scenario in the Vila Health community by considering the determinants of health, barriers impacting safety, health, and disaster recovery efforts, and the effects of health and governmental policies. We have suggested strategies grounded in evidence to tackle communication obstacles and improve interdisciplinary cooperation, which is essential for the effectiveness of disaster recovery endeavors. Our plan aims to lessen health disparities, improve access to community services, and promote health equity by incorporating principles of social justice and cultural sensitivity.

Through regular training sessions, the use of technology, clear protocols, and the provision of language interpretation services, we can ensure that our disaster recovery plan is effective and inclusive. Together, we can help the Vila Health community recover from this devastating train derailment and build a more resilient and equitable future for all its members. Thank you for your attention, and I’m happy to answer any questions you may have.

References

Brown, M. R., Fifolt, M., Lee, H., Nabavi, M., Kidd, E., Viles, A., Lee White, M., & McCormick, L. C. (2022). Disaster preparedness: An interprofessional student incident command system simulation. Journal of Interprofessional Education & Practice, 100507. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xjep.2022.100507

Charlton, C. L., Hull, N., Sloma, C. R., Bonifas, M., Johnson, M., Strain, A. K., … & Bind, E. P. (2021). How to prepare for the unexpected: A public health laboratory response. Clinical Microbiology Reviews, 34(3), e00183-20. https://doi.org/10.1128/cmr.00183-20

Greiner, A. L., Stehling-Ariza, T., Bugli, D., Hoffman, A., Giese, C., Moorhouse, L., Neatherlin, J. C., & Shahpar, C. (2020). Challenges in public health rapid response team management. Health Security, 18(S1), S-8-S-13. https://doi.org/10.1089/hs.2019.0060

NURS FPX 4060 Assessment 3 Disaster Recovery Plan

Jillson, I. A., Clarke, M., Allen, C., Waller, S., Koehlmoos, T., Mumford, W., Jansen, J., McKay, K., & Trant, A. (2019). Improving the science and evidence base of disaster response: Policy research study. BMC Health Services Research, 19(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-019-4102-5

Khatri, R. B., & Assefa, Y. (2022). Access to health services among culturally and linguistically diverse populations in the Australian universal health care system: Issues and challenges. BMC Public Health, 22(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-13256-z

Kianian, T., Pakpour, V., Zamanzadeh, V., Lotfi, M., Rezayan, A., Hazrati, M., & Gholizadeh, M. (2022). Cultural factors and social changes affecting home healthcare in Iran: A qualitative study. Home Health Care Management & Practice, 108482232110722. https://doi.org/10.1177/10848223211072224

Lee, J. M., Jansen, R., Sanderson, K. E., Guerra, F., Keller-Olaman, S., Murti, M., O’Sullivan, T. L., Law, M. P., Schwartz, B., Bourns, L. E., & Khan, Y. (2023). Public health emergency preparedness for infectious disease emergencies: A scoping review of recent evidence. BMC Public Health, 23(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-15313-7

Lewis, J., Hernández, D., & Geronimus, A. T. (2019). Energy efficiency as energy justice: Addressing racial inequities through investments in people and places. Energy Efficiency. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12053-019-09820-z

NURS FPX 4060 Assessment 3 Disaster Recovery Plan

Madanian, S., Abbas, R. A., Norris, T., & Parry, D. (2023). Mobile technologies in disaster healthcare: Technology and operational aspects. In Research Anthology on Managing Crisis and Risk Communications. IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-9645-7.ch004

Morganstein, J. C., & Ursano, R. J. (2020). Ecological disasters and mental health: Causes, consequences, and interventions. Frontiers in psychiatry, 11, 1. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00001

Mukhopadhyay, A., Duttagupta, S., & Mukherjee, A. (2022). Emerging organic contaminants in global community drinking water sources and supply: A review of occurrences, processes and removal. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 107560. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2022.107560

Ogbe, E., Harmon, S., Van den Bergh, R., & Degomme, O. (2020). A systematic review of intimate partner violence interventions focused on improving social support and mental health outcomes of survivors. PLOS ONE, 15(6), e0235177. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0235177

Omboni, S., Padwal, R. S., Alessa, T., Benczúr, B., Green, B. B., Hubbard, I., Kario, K., Khan, N. A., Konradi, A., Logan, A. G., Lu, Y., Mars, M., McManus, R. J., Melville, S., Neumann, C. L., Parati, G., Renna, N. F., Ryvlin, P., Saner, H., & Schutte, A. E. (2022). The worldwide impact of telemedicine during COVID-19: Current evidence and recommendations for the future. Connected Health. https://doi.org/10.20517/ch.2021.03

NURS FPX 4060 Assessment 3 Disaster Recovery Plan

Pollock, M. J., Wennerstrom, A., True, G., Everett, A., Sugarman, O., Haywood, C., Johnson, A., Meyers, D., Sato, J., Wells, K. B., Arevian, A. C., Massimi, M., Berry, J., Riefberg, L., Onyewuenyi, N., & Springgate, B. (2019). Preparedness and community resilience in disaster-prone areas: Cross-sectoral collaborations in South Louisiana, 2018. American Journal of Public Health, 109(S4), S309–S315. https://doi.org/10.2105/ajph.2019.305152

Pradhan, N. A., Najmi, R., & Fatmi, Z. (2022). District health systems capacity to maintain healthcare service delivery in Pakistan during floods: A qualitative study. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 78, 103092. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2022.103092

Reinke, A. J., & Bevilacqua, N. (2022). Legal aid amid bureaucracy. Journal of Legal Anthropology, 6(2), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.3167/jla.2022.060201

Rouhanizadeh, B., & Kermanshachi, S. (2019). Investigating the relationships of socioeconomic factors delaying post-disaster reconstruction. Computing in Civil Engineering 2019. https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784482445.005

Sheikhi, R. A., Seyedin, H., Qanizadeh, G., & Jahangiri, K. (2020). Role of religious institutions in disaster risk management: A systematic review. Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1017/dmp.2019.145

Torani, S., Majd, P. M., Maroufi, S. S., Dowlati, M., & Sheikhi, R. A. (2019). The importance of education on disasters and emergencies: A review article. Journal of Education and Health Promotion, 8, 85. https://doi.org/10.4103/jehp.jehp_262_18

Zhang, Y., Moyle, B., Dupré, K., Lohmann, G., Desha, C., & MacKenzie, I. (2023). Tourism and natural disaster management: A systematic narrative review. Tourism Review. https://doi.org/10.1108/tr-08-2022-0377