MHA FPX 5028 Assessment 2 NGO Proposal
Phillip May 16, 2024 No Comments

MHA FPX 5028 Assessment 2 NGO Proposal

MHA FPX 5028 Assessment 2 NGO Proposal

Name

Capella university

MHA-FPX 5028 Comparative Models of Global Health Systems

Prof. Name

Date

NGO Proposal

The global health landscape faces significant challenges due to the spread of infectious diseases, posing a considerable public health concern. While providing adequate healthcare brings numerous benefits, it also entails substantial costs. Improving global health policies aligns with the World Health Organization’s (WHO) Millennium Development Goals (MDGs). International bodies such as the United Nations (UN) and the International Monetary Fund (IMF) wield significant influence over global health policy. Various entities, including international scientific, advocacy/policy, and foundation groups, actively engage in global health research (National Institutes of Health Fogarty International Center, 2015). Effective healthcare provision necessitates the ability to supplement existing services to address diverse issues. Employing evidence-based techniques in project analysis and progress tracking is essential, as outlined in the proposed methodology.

Executive Summary

The HIV/AIDS epidemic disproportionately affects young people in Sub-Saharan Africa, particularly in Zimbabwe. Gender stereotypes, discrimination, abuse, and limited access to tailored treatments and education exacerbate vulnerability among young women and girls, contributing to the spread of infections. Adolescent and young women face a significantly higher risk of contracting viruses or bacteria compared to their male counterparts. With the youth population in Sub-Saharan Africa projected to increase in the coming decade, extending treatment services becomes increasingly vital. Effective prevention efforts must complement treatment strategies to curb the epidemic, considering the anticipated rise in infections (The Global Fund, 2019).

To combat rising infection rates effectively, a collaborative approach on a global scale is imperative. Enhanced public awareness, increased funding, and concerted efforts can potentially slow the epidemic’s progression. Targeting key groups through comprehensive prevention, testing, treatment, and support initiatives can mitigate barriers to healthcare access (The Global Fund, 2019).

NGO Proposal Analysis

Perspective

Objectives

Financial Seek funding to reduce treatment costs, develop preventive measures, and allocate resources to rural and farming areas.
Customer Lead and support volunteer missions, ensure clear communication of requirements.
Internal Processes Involve stakeholders in strategic planning, base decisions on current research, explore new technologies and systems.
People Development Achieve health-related outcomes, implement education and training programs for employees.

Project Evaluation

In evaluating NGO outcomes in low- and middle-income countries, optimal techniques and evidence-based methodologies should be employed. A standardized evaluation framework can serve as a diagnostic tool for quality improvement strategies. Tracking results before and after implementing quality improvement initiatives facilitates the assessment of treatment effectiveness. Such measures contribute to the delivery of efficient and effective healthcare, benefiting both patients and the healthcare system (Dilley et al., 2012; McLees et al., 2015).

Conclusion

The Global Fund’s capacity to mobilize resources positions it favorably to address financial gaps in Zimbabwe’s healthcare system. Collaboration with NGOs can enhance existing prevention and treatment programs, addressing community needs and resource deficiencies. By leveraging resources and strategies, NGOs can effectively combat infectious diseases and bridge service gaps, ultimately improving health outcomes in vulnerable populations.

References

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2017). Global health: What CDC is doing. Retrieved from https://www.cdc.gov/globalhealth/what/default.htm

Dilley, J. A., Bekemeier, B., & Harris, J. R. (2012). Quality improvement interventions in public health systems: a systematic review. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 42(5), S58-S71.

McLees, A. W., Nawaz, S., Thomas, C., & Young, A. (2015). Defining and assessing quality improvement outcomes: A framework for public health. American Journal of Public Health, 105(Supplement 2), S167–S173.

MHA FPX 5028 Assessment 2 NGO Proposal

Muenning, P., & Su, C. (2013). Introducing global health: Practice, policy, and solutions. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Mugwagwa, J.T., Chinyadza, J.K., and Banda, G. (2017). Private sector participation in health care in Zimbabwe: What’s the value-added? Journal of Healthcare Communications, 2(2). doi: 10.4172/2472-1654.100050.

National Institutes of Health Fogarty International Center. (2015). Nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) working on global health research. Retrieved from https://www.fic.nih.gov/Global/Pages/NGOs.aspx.

Ruelas, E., Gómez-Dantés, O., Leatherman, S., Fortune, T., & Gay-Molina, J. B. (2012). Strengthening the quality agenda in health care in low- and middle-income countries: Questions to consider. International Journal for Quality in Health Care, 24(6), 553–557.

MHA FPX 5028 Assessment 2 NGO Proposal

The Global Fund. (2019). HIV & AIDS. Retrieved from https://www.theglobalfund.org/en/hivaids/.