PSY FPX 7543 Assessment 3 Ethical Dilemma Case Study
Phillip April 23, 2024 No Comments

PSY FPX 7543 Assessment 3 Ethical Dilemma Case Study

PSY FPX 7543 Assessment 3 Ethical Dilemma Case Study

Name

Capella university

PSY FPX 7543 Ethics and Multicultural Issues in Psychology

Prof. Name

Date

Case Study Summary

Competence Boundary and Accuracy in Teaching

Psychologists must operate within the bounds of their expertise, ensuring their services, teaching, and research align with their education, training, and professional experience. They are also obligated to ensure the accuracy of course syllabi and educational materials (APA, 2010).

Ethical Concerns: Discrimination

Psychologists are prohibited from engaging in unfair discrimination in their professional activities based on various factors including age, gender, race, ethnicity, and others (APA, 2010).

Ethical Comparison: Deontology vs. Utilitarianism

Deontology

Utilitarianism

Prioritizes action over consequences Focuses on the consequences of an action
Emphasizes adherence to rules Ethical principle based on benefit and usefulness
Commitment to moral principles is paramount Action depends on the situation

Ethical Decision Making using the Deontological Model

  1. Identify the Dilemma: Recognize conflicts in ethical principles.
  2. Gather Information: Understand the context and perspectives involved.
  3. Consult the Code of Ethics: Refer to ethical guidelines related to the dilemma.
  4. Develop a Plan of Action: Brainstorm potential actions considering risks and benefits.
  5. Choose a Solution: Select a solution aligning with moral principles and maximizing prospects.
  6. Implement the Plan: Put the chosen solution into action.

Jenny’s dilemma involves whether to accept an offer to teach Biopsychology despite feeling inadequately competent. Following the Deontological Model, she should discuss her concerns with Professor Ben and express her interest in improving her qualifications, ensuring alignment with her moral principles (Mandal & Ponnambath, 2016; Schildmann et al., 2010).

Proposed Resolution

Jenny will engage in open dialogue with Professor Ben, expressing her concerns about her competence and interest in enhancing her qualifications. This approach ensures ethical conduct while fostering professional growth (Radeke & Stahelski, 2020).

References

American Psychological Association. (2010). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct. Retrieved from http://www.apa.org/ethics/code/index.aspx

Mandal, J., Ponnambath, D., & Parija, S. (2016). Utilitarian and deontological ethics in medicine. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4778182/?tool=pmcentrez&report=abstract

PSY FPX 7543 Assessment 3 Ethical Dilemma Case Study

Radeke, M. K., & Stahelski, A. J. (2020). Altering age and gender stereotypes by creating the Halo and Horns Effects with facial expressions. Humanities & Social Sciences Communications. Retrieved from https://www.nature.com/articles/s41599-020-0504-6

Schildmann, Jan; Gordon, John-Stewart; Vollmann, Jochen (2010) Clinical ethics consultation theories and methods, implementation, evaluation. Retrieved from https://ebookcentral-proquest-com.library.capella.edu/lib/capella/reader.action?docID=592373

PSY FPX 7543 Assessment 3 Ethical Dilemma Case Study

Tseng, Po-En; Wang, Ya-Huei. (2021) Deontological or Utilitarian? An Eternal Ethical Dilemma in Outbreak. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. Retrieved from https://www.proquest.com/docview/2565251589/fulltextPDF/3D999799CA0F466APQ/1?accountid=27965