PSY FPX 8740 Assessment 5 Ethical and Legal Aspects of I-O Psychology
Phillip April 24, 2024 No Comments

PSY FPX 8740 Assessment 5 Ethical and Legal Aspects of I-O Psychology

PSY FPX 8740 Assessment 5 Ethical and Legal Aspects of I-O Psychology

Name

Capella university

PSY FPX 8740 Industrial/Organizational Psychology Practices in Human Resource Management

Prof. Name

Date

Exploring Ethical and Legal Dimensions in Industrial-Organizational Psychology

When delving into the realm of psychology, it’s easy to overlook the significant role that legal and ethical considerations play. However, for professionals in fields like Industrial and Organizational (I-O) psychology, understanding and adhering to these principles is paramount. Psychologists must maintain not only their expertise in their specialized areas but also stay abreast of legal frameworks and ethical standards that may impact their practice (Black, 2016). This discussion focuses on the ethical and legal challenges inherent in a case study scenario, offering insights into potential approaches for resolution.

Ethical Dimensions in the Case Study

In the case study scenario involving a consultant psychologist contracted by PurpleSky Inc., several ethical concerns come to light. One prominent issue revolves around the CEO’s autocratic leadership style, which fosters a toxic organizational culture characterized by poor communication and demoralization (Capella University, n.d.). Autocratic leadership, typified by centralized decision-making with minimal input from team members, has been associated with detrimental effects on team dynamics and performance (De Hoogh, Greer, & Den Hartog, 2015). Moreover, such environments can exacerbate stress levels among employees, leading to diminished productivity and well-being (Colligan & Higgins, 2006).

Additionally, there’s an ethical dilemma surrounding the psychologist’s colleague’s suggestion to comply with the CEO’s request for team-building activities without addressing underlying issues. This recommendation conflicts with principles outlined in the American Psychological Association (APA) Ethics Code, particularly regarding fidelity, integrity, and the basis for professional judgments (APA, 2010). Fulfilling the request under false pretenses undermines trust, compromises professional integrity, and neglects the duty to prioritize scientific and ethical standards (Principles B and C; Standard 2.01).

Navigating Ethical and Legal Challenges

Addressing ethical and legal dilemmas requires a systematic approach, such as Rest’s Four-Component Model of Moral Behavior (1994). Firstly, moral sensitivity entails recognizing the ethical implications of one’s actions, emphasizing the potential harm of misrepresenting services to the CEO (Lincoln & Holmes, 2011). Subsequently, moral judgment involves weighing potential solutions, including transparently discussing organizational issues with the CEO or abstaining from the assignment due to ethical conflicts. Moral motivation underscores the importance of prioritizing ethical considerations over personal interests, while moral character emphasizes the courage to uphold ethical standards in action (Rest, 1994).

Confidentiality Challenges

Confidentiality poses another ethical quandary, particularly concerning the psychologist’s obligation to safeguard employee privacy (APA, 2010). Disclosing the identities of employees interviewed to the CEO could compromise their trust and livelihoods, violating ethical principles of beneficence and nonmaleficence (APA, 2010). Fisher (2008) advocates for establishing confidentiality protocols at the onset of client engagements to mitigate such risks.

Future Directions in Ethical Research

Exploring the ethical dimensions highlighted in this case study presents avenues for future research. Investigating the relationship between toxic workplace environments and employee well-being can offer insights into mitigating stress and enhancing organizational health (Anjum & Ming, 2018). Similarly, examining the impact of autocratic leadership on employee health and productivity can inform strategies for fostering more positive work environments. Additionally, research focusing on confidentiality issues within autocratic leadership contexts can provide practitioners with practical frameworks for navigating complex ethical dilemmas.

References

American Psychological Association. (2010). Ethical principles of psychologist and code of conduct. Retrieved from https://www.apa.org/ethics/code/principles.pdf

Anderson, C., & Brown, C. E. (2010). The functions and dysfunctions of hierarchy. Research in Organizational Behavior, 30, 55-89. doi:10.1016/j.riob.2010.08.002

PSY FPX 8740 Assessment 5 Ethical and Legal Aspects of I-O Psychology

Anjum, A., & Ming, X. (2018). Combating toxic workplace environment. Journal of Modelling in Management, 13(3), 675-697. doi:10.1108/JM2-02-2017-0023

De Cremer, D. (2006). Affective and motivational consequences of leader self-sacrifice: The moderating effect of autocratic leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 17(1), 79-93. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2005.10.005

De Hoogh, A. H. B., Greer, L. L., & Den Hartog, D. N. (2015). Diabolical dictators or capable commanders? an investigation of the differential effects of autocratic leadership on team performance. The Leadership Quarterly, 26(5), 687-701. doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2015.01.001

Fisher, M. A. (2008). Protecting confidentiality rights: The need for an ethical practice model. American Psychologist, 63(1), 1-13. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.63.1.1

Colligan, T. W., & Higgins, E. M. (2006). Workplace stress: Etiology and consequences. Journal of workplace behavioral health, 21(2), 89-97. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/228494076_Workplace_stress_Etiology_and_consequences

PSY FPX 8740 Assessment 5 Ethical and Legal Aspects of I-O Psychology

Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology. (n.d.) About the society for industrial and organizational psychology. Retrieved from https://www.siop.org/About-SIOP